FamilyEducation Blogs


April 30, 2009

Testing, testing

I have a knot in my stomach these days. It's not for myself, but for L. Next week is EOG week at L.'s school--the week the end-of-grade tests are administered in North Carolina to students in third, fifth, and eight grades. Other students in other states are facing end-of-year testing too: Florida has the FCAT, Illinios has the ISAT, New York has the NY math test and the ELA (language arts) and in North Carolina, we have the EOGs. And while L.'s school does everything they can to try and make EOG testing "fun" and stress-free, I'm sure none of the kids taking the tests will remember the experience being at all fun (taking tests is like going to the dentist, isn't it?). In fact, going into the test many kids will have already endured a fair amount of stress, I'm sure, if they haven't already. It's a difficult time for parents, as well--especially if your child doesn't test well. It's also a helpless time because there's just so little you can do to help prepare your child for end-of-grade testing.

Or is there? A neighbor recently forked out some hefty money to pay for extra math tutoring for her son. The school told her he might not pass the math EOGs and could face being retained. In the parking lot the other day I heard one mom telling another mom that for some weeks now they have been setting aside 30 minutes/day to "study" for the EOG exams--an exam that isn't supposed to be studied for, really, since it's supposed to reflect skills and knowledge accumulated throughout the school year. But even though I know intellectually that there is no way for a child to really study for the tests, I still felt a moment of panic when I heard those moms talking--it was like that feeling of dread you get when you walk into class one day and discover you have a test you didn't study for. We're lucky to make it through a homework session with L. with our patience (and hair) intact, let alone make him work through thirty minutes of extra EOG prep work like this (a poem about bubble gum?).

I know most parents are not making their kids study for these end-of-grade exams, but I also know that many parents around here are worried about the tests; worried about how their children will score, and worried about how their children will feel when they take the exams. My worries started months ago, when it became clear that enrichment curriculum options were being pushed by the wayside so teachers who found themselves strapped for time in the classroom could focus more on the material that the EOG will cover; in other words, more creative, potentially interesting enrichment material that might have appealed to students (yes, I'm talking about my own son) with a wider range of interests was left by the wayside in order to teach to the tests. I've heard these concerns echoed by third grade parents at other schools as well. It's not the teachers' fault; schools are strapped for resources and time, and with budget cuts looming for next year they will find themselves even more strapped. But I still think it's unfair for our children--young children at only eight or nine, to have to feel so early the pressure of days of test-taking, and to have to miss out on more creative curriculum all in the name of preparing for three days of test-taking.

We're keeping things very casual and calm around here as far as the EOGs go. Without a lot of hoopla about it, we're spending about 5-10 minutes each day (sometimes at dinnertime, sometimes in the car, sometimes during homework) just mentioning the tests, and touching base on small things: whether L. is worried (he says he's not), what the readings on it might be about, how he might feel while he's taking the tests. But really I think the best thing we can do is be low-key about it all, cross our fingers, and hope for the best.

Is your child getting ready for end-of-grade testing? What are you doing to help prepare them for days of test-taking?

For our school, the testing happened a couple weeks ago. It's high stakes for grades 3 and up, but even the younger ones take a computer-based skills test. Scooter's teacher was railing that the kindergarten math curriculum saves addition and subtraction for the very end, but the test included questions of that sort anyway. Scooter's class won't go into the formula for adequate yearly progress, but their performance will be used in other assessments.

I'm waiting for something to change with this. It's such a flawed system and creates lots of stress while not ensuring true mastery. I suppose that will have to wait until after the economy's stabilized.


96 people found this comment helpful

Yes, I agree--our new president has so much on his plate now that I think these changes won't be happening any time soon. But it is such a flawed system, as you point out. I can't believe how high the stakes are for third graders and for their teachers, who must feel tremendous pressure as well.


97 people found this comment helpful

Our district calls them ELO tests - Essential Learner Outcomes. I don't know yet what grades they occur in because, thank goodness, it's not kindergarten. I don't think retention occurs when a kid doesn't pass them, but there are retakes and relooping. I'm with you, it makes me mad that small children have to stress over tests. When I was in school we took California Achievement Tests. Parents got a percentile and it told them where we stood as students when compared to a standardized groups. I don't remember it being all that upsetting.
Testing really hacks me off and I have to sort of stay detached or I get really, really frustrated. Education has swung way too far to one side of the extreme (government involvement and testing, testing, testing) and I was really disappointed to hear a blurb on Obama's feelings on the subject. It involved data (which can't tell the whole story!) and tying teacher's merit pay to student achievement. Ahhhhh! Kids don't fit into the box. Hasn't anyone mentioned that the bell curve is the bell curve for a reason and that there will always be outliers! Either for reasons of kids who do not test well on a standard exam or because a kid has developed atypically. So kids are getting removed from certain courses because it would look "bad" that they can't perform as expected on the exams.
Okay, you can see why I have to stay detached. I could rant and rant and rant...


94 people found this comment helpful

Oh, and I was the strange kid who enjoyed testing. Fill-in-the-bubble testing was so structured and the expectations were always the same. And it meant a quiet classroom for a good long time.

Doesn't mean I agree with the format or reasons behind it now, just that I was an outcomes-based nerd.


96 people found this comment helpful

Rant away, Omaha, it's healthy! Around these parts retention is linked very specifically to these scores, regardless of how a student has been doing all year round. And, alas, I do worry that things won't change too much anytime soon, and unfortunately people are still sticking to this idea that data somehow fixes everything...

It's funny, mouse, L. likes the comfort of filling in bubbles and the quiet classroom. He doesn't do well on the test because of the way he thinks--capturing the details and intricate pieces of things, but not honing in on general things like a story's "purpose" or an emotion the character is feeling.


97 people found this comment helpful

Oh, and horror of horrors, any child scoring below a 3 on the EOGs this year will have to take the retest the week after! This seems ridiculous to me, since data (there we go again with data) shows that very few people are likely to score much better when they take a retest the week after the original one.


95 people found this comment helpful

I agree with your feelings about EOG testing. There is something you can do. Write or email your legislators. They need to hear lots of personal stories about how stressful these tests are and how much time preparing for them takes away from real learning.

The No Child Left Behind Act mandates that states give tests to determine whether or not children are proficient in particular subjects. However, it does not mandate what test must be used. Each state gets to choose their own. The NC tests have been "ramped up" to make them more "challenging". Much of the material they cover is not developmentally appropriate for the age of the students being tested.

If enough people in our state complain, perhaps the legislature will take a hard look at the particular tests currently being given.

Also, the No Child Left Behind Act will be up for reauthorization, probably in 2010. Let your representatives in Washington know about the unplanned effects it is having on our children.


52 people found this comment helpful

Thank you so much for your comment. I'm putting together a packet of "complaints" and comments--and stories, too--about EOG testing and NCLB issues. I think I'm more cynical as far as what can be done, although I hope there will be room for some reforms soon. I've been very frustrated with the system for some time now, and I know I am not alone.


51 people found this comment helpful