Professor Mom
Average
I gave a quiz in my 10:00 class yesterday. One of my students, who so far has always been ready in class with the right answers, and excited about the course material, and in every way just the kind of student I love to have in class, fell apart when he got the quiz. His hands shook, sweat beads popped out on his forehead. He second-guessed every answer he put down, raising his hand constantly throughout the quiz for clarification, reassurance, validation, his voice wobbling nervously every time he asked a question. My heart went out to him, over and over again.
After class, when he handed in the quiz, I asked him, "How did you do?"
He hesitated. "I think okay," he said.
"See! There was no need to be so nervous."
"I'm just an average student," he said, "and I don't want to screw this up."
He left before the full impact of his words struck me. Average? How was he an average student? Who applies these labels, anyway? How do they come into existence? What does average mean?
Average. I dislike that word so much.
***********
In third grade, during all the preparations for end-of-grade testing that went on, and while giving instructions right before a prep test for a math assessment, L.'s teacher read this part of the instruction sheet to the class:
"The average student finishes the first part of this test in an hour."
It seemed a harmless enough statement, but the fallout from it has extended across to almost every math test L. has taken since.
You see, when the teacher said "average" L. heard "usual or ordinary or below the highest level" and since then he has always rushed through all his math tests in ten minutes or less.
"'Average' just means the 'statistical norm'" I tried explaining to L. "It doesn't mean that if you take an hour you're less than good, or unexceptional."
But when L. hears something and defines it to himself in his own mind, there is no budging him; this is a type of mind block so common in children (and adults) with Asperger's. I tried explaining this to his math teacher recently. She likes to send home his math assessment tests with the Time Started and Time Ended written in pen on the front of the test and with lots of exclamation points, just to underscore the point that he finished in seven minutes. Yet I know that L. finished the test quickly just because he wants to be better-than-average. If the average student finishes in an hour then by god he's going to do it in less. Much less.
I don't know how to work through this particular mind block, but I do know that I dislike the word 'average'. I dislike it not because I think it's a terrible thing to be average, but it's a muddy, ambiguous word. Even being below-average seems to imply something more concrete, and interesting; it connotes a sense of motion, implying that you can move up from there, leap from someplace underneath, out into the open light. I dislike the word 'average' because it locks so many kids down, sucking them into the plainness of the word, painting everything they do gray and flat.
"You're not average," I told my student. "No one in my class is average."
I tell L. over and over again, "You're not average."
Maybe if we repeat it often enough, people will listen. There are no average kids, no average people; we may not all be good at everything we try all of the time, but we're better than average, of course we are.
Much better.







Comments
I did the same thing in school, still do to some extent--on standardized tests, not so much on the open-ended doctoral exams. The more concrete the information being tested, the faster I go. My main goal with those math timed tests was to finish as quickly as I could.
As an educator, it seems to me the better way to word such directions would be something like "x amount of time has been allotted for this test. If you finish early, check your work and then do y."
I completely agree, Mouse. It's frustrating that something so innocent-seeming, like the wording of instructions, could have such an impact on a child's test-taking strategies. The big problem is that it is so hard to "undo" damage done because L. takes things so literally. We have lots of problems with this particular math teacher because she uses so much sarcasm in her interactions with L. and he doesn't know how to take this. Every day he comes home with a quote from her that he's taken literally and we have to do damage control to explain her meaning.
On the other hand, I guess, these are good lessons for him...
As someone who teaches kids who fall into the 'well below average' IQ range on their MDTs and actually has to write that in their paperwork whether I like the wording or not...I think of average as quite good. Looking up from down there, average is amazing. Average intelligence. Average looking. Average income. Looks pretty darn good from those who are well below average. Maybe if you talked to L about it in terms of how you determine an average? By adding up all of the numbers and dividing them? Maybe he'd see it's not a derogatory term, but a word to describe a mathematic equation? Good luck with that, I know how hard it can be to change a pattern of thought.
I guess it does depend on your perspective. I just wince over these "average" and "below average" labels because I see how lasting they are. Kids carry them right on with them into college, and they are so hard to shake.